@article{oai:kokushikan.repo.nii.ac.jp:00014212,
 author = {馬場, 亮輔 and BABA, Ryosuke and 熊谷, 慎太郎 and KUMAGAI, Shintaro},
 journal = {体育・スポーツ科学研究, Kokushikan society of sport science},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {J-GLOBAL ID : 201801019887970387, The aim of this study was to ascertain changes in the elements of routines accompanying revision of the 2013 Code of Points for gymnastics to the 2017-2020 version. This study compared the performances of the 8 finalists on the horizontal bar during the Rio Olympic Games in 2016 and the World Gymnastics Championship in 2017.
　Techniques used by world-class athletes and combined techniques used to earn additional points were identified. Elements in Group 1 were performed without incurring an angular deduction. In addition, athletes may be able to increase their E score by performing a flying giant swing backward with a 1/1 turn. Athletes can increase their D score by performing Group 2 elements such as a Kovacs with a 2/1 turn or a Kovacs with a 2/1 turn stretched. Of the elements in Group 3, an Adler with 1/2 turn through a headstand in over-grip is less likely to incur a deduction than a similar technique, so athletes performing that technique could potentially increase their E score. A dichotomy was evident in the scoring of Group 4 elements, so FIG needs to take action to deal with this situation. Prior to the revision, an Adler element was often performed as a way to earn additional points. A Tkatchev must be used to earn additional points for a release with a difficulty level of C, D, or E. Continuous techniques with a somersault have increasingly been used to earn additional points for a release with a difficulty level of D or E.
　This study revealed changes in elements of routines intended to earn high scores accompanying revision of the Code of Points., application/pdf},
 pages = {27--38},
 title = {2017年版採点規則への改定に伴う演技構成の変遷と動向 : 鉄棒に着目して},
 volume = {19},
 year = {2019},
 yomi = {ババ, リョウスケ and クマガイ, シンタロウ}
}